In the 80’s Sabah and Sarawak had their own Merchants Shipping Ordinance 1952 which empowered to give license to merchant’s ships. It was repealed, giving way for the Federal government to streamline the laws of the seas, but the people of Sabah and Sarawak as the consequence suffered. The Federal government policy is to assist the government of Malaysian shipping industry little connected to Sabah and Sarawak shipping industry.
In Malaya, their development concentration is mainly at Port Klang, all major towns are easily accessible by good roads and railways. The other 5 major ports is already a Federal Port, so there is really no concern about shipping. Industrialization strategies undertaken in the 70’s to the 90’s are consistent with this development.
Both leaders at the Federal and the State level are equally blamable. The leaders at the centre argued they are looking at the national interest, as far as they are concerned, the political backlash for them making the decision practically is nil. While at the State level keeping quiet for what I asked, have they pursued for the interest of the people?
When the States cannot say and have no say, the people are the losers, and industrialization handicapped due to mainly shipping cost factor.
Where and what sound good relationship between Federal and State leadership really is or a marriage for convenience or a relationship merely cloaking to a more sinister conspiracy to ensure the people in Sabah and Sarawak is subservient to the master in Malaya?
Since the shipping industry is equally influential for the State economy perhaps it is appropriate that next election to think hard before casting your vote, no more relying on instruction.
Freight charges and inland transport cost is the magic mantra, the government keeps on chanting to justify the Cabotage Policy. This shows the shallowness and myopic view on the government leadership rather than an acceptable excuse.
Malaya has 5 ports and all of them are categorized as Federal Ports. Sabah has 7 ports and none of them is categorized as Federal Port. A Federal Port permits foreign registered vessels to load and off load their cargos whilst a state port only allowed loading and offloading goods from Malaysian Registered Vessels. Malaya has good roads crisscrossing all over the place whilst Sabah has limited access and sub-standard roads.
This means if someone wants to import goods from Hong Kong, these goods have to go to Port Klang, as the country load centre and then transferred to a Malaysian Registered Vessels and sent back to Kota Kinabalu for consumers. Within Sabah itself, goods have to be transported to all major towns by ship rather than using inland transport.
The Minister has it wrong when he says inland transportation cost as one of the factor that increases the price of goods in Sabah. He must have confused the condition in Malaya is the same as in Sabah?
This is one major reason we have price difference between Malaya and Sabah. In economics this is called Purchasing Power Parity PPP. It also means that RM1.00 is valued as RM1.00 in Kuala Lumpur. In Kota Kinabalu RM1.00 probably have a value of RM0.70 cents. This value may reduce further as we go to Keningau, Tenom and eventually Tilis.
I think the Minister responsible should start doing his own shopping. When he does, look at the printed Recommended Retails Price RRP of goods. It clearly printed on their boxes, wrapping or covers-one price for Peninsular Malaysia-Malaya and another price for East Malaysia-Sabah and Sarawak.
Our own leaders have been harping that their good relation to leaders in the centre contributes to the development in the state. Why then has the Cabotage policy drag on for more than 20 years and still no light at the end of the tunnel?
It’s the price determine our capacity and capability to bring about development?



